posts
Ah, been longer than I realized but it's still here. How are you, friendly robot? And you, many and varied fans? And me?
Nonsense is not always interesting.
I will contribute more to the Space Monkey project, I swear!
I hear the music now.
Ah, been longer than I realized but it's still here. How are you, friendly robot? And you, many and varied fans? And me?
Philosophy is a noble pursuit if you intend to use your expertise to share enlightenment with those who do not have the luxury of conscience to invest time into puzzling through those myriad realities. But it is an exercise in ego and control to take it upon oneself to manipulate those without your vocabulary through a role playing scenario, sexualized for your own perverse enjoyment because you can't get what you want in the real world, in order to tell someone else what they believe through what category your put them in. Like organized religion, the moral box is not "one size fits all", which is why there will never be a unified theory of philosophy, unlike physics which may be used to answer some philosophical riddles, but will never uncover what is really going on. What we value is what is ultimately the tell all of our character, and the word, as we know, has been appropriated. But I can take it back as much as anyone, so I will. If you value peace, you are one kind of person. If you value a perpetual war, you are another. That is one model that can be used to split the human race in two, although all models eventually fail, because no metaphor is complete [another misunderstanding standing in the way of clarity]. Whether it is a war on terror or a war on power, or even a war on war, you are an advocate of collateral damage of one kind or another. If you want peace, you want peace. Let the warriors kill each other. Leave me out of it. You can say this is selfish because it doesn't do enough to help get other peace lovers out of the warriors' path, but that is not true, as peace is only a wish. Abandonment is never an option. But planning a better rescue strategy is never a bad idea. If you do nothing to value your own safety, you are dishonoring the endangered, and devaluing their lives along with your own. Disagreeing with another rescuer on strategy is never a reason to halt the process, nor call to accuse them of treachery. You can use another model of the human race to divide us into two categories, or a billion, depending on how much detail you want, but at some point it becomes less than useful.
It has occurred to me that the path to ignorance is not just ignoring the facts, but having a poor understanding of metaphor. I believe this is intentionally under taught in the United States.
Are you Marx? Or are you Stalin? I hope the Stalins of the world hide in shame. Never show their faces. And never gain positions of power, to banish those who question their authority and attempt to rewrite history, whether by erasing their own words, their own interactions, or by killing, all the while accusing others who question their mental state of conspiring to murder them. So again, you must look at yourself, and examine who is really the betrayer of the the cause. Who wants to stifle dissent. Who is insecure and needs position and title and power to feel safe. Who?
The modest part you play
I am not obligated to understand what is going on in the world.
Sometimes you look at the landscape and see where the poison is, and you can ramble along safely, knowing the terrain, dodging the bullets, and then you can sift through ruins that are left behind by the poisons, and learn who and what was strong enough to resist. Of course, the weak may be worth saving too, but it's still good to know.