Random thoughts on Woody Allen
Perhaps these thoughts are not really random, for I have thought them for some time. I have been a fn of Woody Allen for some time, intitially because I identified with the nerdy character he most often portrays, and subsequently just because of his comedy and his talent at what I'd call, perhaps, introverted drama. Crimes and Misdemeanors was my favorite for years, contrasting a dark murder story with a comedic, failed romance story. The ending summation, that Woody's character was over-romanticizing reality, even while trying to be realistic, spoke truth to me. These days I tend to favor Stardust Memories, possibly just because it features aliens, but it seems to me to be one of his most consistent films, and the most rewarding of frequent viewing.
But alas, Woody Allen has faltered of late. One can't expect him to hit it out of the ballpark every time, and for years I was frustrated with people who saw the latest Woody Allen film and complained he had lost it. I'd tell them it was true it was a minor work from a great artist, but that he'd be back next year with a masterpiece. For a while, I was right.
So what is the problem? Sweet and Lowdown was his last truly gratifying picture, but for a few films before and since, his work has been sub par. He is writing the same characters and conversations into every script, and while the main plot thrust changes, it is not enough of a difference to make it as interesting as it could be. He has always had similar situations repeated from film to film, but has changed the situation or setting enough to give it a twist that kept the characters reactions novel. This does not seem to be the case anymore. Anything Else was extremely boring and miscast, but might have been a fine film had it been set.... anywhere else... been populated by actors who "got it," or been set in a different time period or whatever. In other words, his script wasn't that bad. Sloppily derivative of his own previous work, sure, but sometimes that has worked for him. It's just the same old same old with no gimmick or crazy situation to put the characters through, and only gets interesting when Woody's character turns out to be on the run from the law... the film is so lacking in memorableness that I don't remember what he is wanted for, but it was mildly amusing. Hollywood Ending started out incredibly dull, but got interesting once the gimmick set in, and had one of the funniest prat falls I've ever seen.
So where does that leave us? How can he make interesting movies again?
He needs to change the setting, or bring the gimmick in more quickly. That forces his stock characters to react to their surroundings and situations.
I have a few suggestions as to those surroundings and situations. He has done Science Fiction a little bit with Sleeper, but he could make an interesting space opera. He should rewrite Flash Gordon (changing the names to protect the innocent, and to protect his wallet from the copyright holders). Or something in that genre. He should also make a thriller. One of those dime a dozen films where Al Pacino or Harrison Ford are running down the street with a gun. He should also do a Rambo type action film. And he should try something along the lines of John Sayles, just setting his story in some different part of the country, or another time period.
Now I know what you may be thinking (of course, I always know what you may be thinking). Would it still be a Woody Allen film? Those don't sound like anything he has ever done! The answer is, of course they don't! For a time, he was doing something new all the time, and that is what made his films so good. He needs to stretch out a bit, and try some genre fiction, just to give his work a kickstart. He's too predictable right now. Did I mention zombie films? I think he'd do well with zombies.
Any other genre suggestions, or possible settings or time periods that would spice up his work?

2 Comments:
Woody has lost it. Or I have lost Woody, I don't know. You talk mainly about recent movies, movies I haven't seen, movies I didn't feel like seeing. The last one I saw was Deconstructing Harry, and it did nothing to me although it should have (there's a lot to do with the concept of deconstruction transposed to both a visual medium and an individual).
The thought that jumped to my mind reading your post was : why should he make interesting movies again at all ? Being an artist is not a job. It's only regarded as such in a society where every activity is a job, that is, petrified and doomed to repetition. Therefore a lot of artists go on writing, playing, shooting, long after they "lost it", and I always found that utterly graceless although understandable. The Rolling Stones' career is part of my idea of indecency.
Woody should rewrite Flash Gordon ? Come on. He should become a baker or play the saxophone in the No Smoking Orchestra.
I like the nerdy character but not his verbosity and the number of movies he flooded. What I like best about Woody is, unsurprisingly, the philosophical aspect of his work. I like the Jew better than the nerd and the Bergman disciple rather than the Manhattan wannabe.
Come to think of it, Zelig was one of my all time fave movies before I even heard of Mike. See, I was predestined to love fake documentaries. But it's not my fault, I was corrupted by a crafty Jew. My other favorites are Interiors, A Midsummer Night's Sex Comedy, Another Woman and Shadows and Fog. The last one to impress me was Bullets Over Broadway, which asked the question : who is an artist ?.... and answered that being an artist is not a trade. I think I'll end with that.
But scroll down for my reply about dumbness. I'm never left dumb about dumbness. Even though it has so much to do with the unnameable.
Yes, he should rewrite Flash Gordon. Perhaps only because it's a fantasy of mine, but yes, he should. The 1980 version of Flash Gordon ranks as one of my top twenty favorite films of all time, and not just for the Queen soundtrack. The design work alone is worth watching, even if there was nothing else.
But Woody Allen's take on the hero thing I think would be almost as hilarious as the real thing, and my whole point is that he has not "lost it" at all, but that he has (forgive me) forgotten where he put it. His intellect is still there, and he is still capable of being hilarious, and emotionally compelling. Sweet and Lowdown was heartbreaking, and proof to me that he still has it. And his other recent weaker films had moments, the best of which happened when his very earthly characters faced something bizarre... even gimmicky.
Deconstructing Harry took a while for me to embrace, but I now consider it to be one of his two last great films (the other being the aforementioned Sweet and Lowdown, which is really more of what would have been considered his lighter fare during his best two decades, but by comparison to recent efforts (and to most "romantic comedies) it is really a great film).
Your suggestion that he join the No Smoking Orchestra is perfect... I'd settle for that over rewriting Flash Gordon, but I'll keep the Flash Gordon idea at least as my personal wish.
Post a Comment
<< Home